Peterson, ., & Peterson, . (2005). Effective teacher evaluation: A guide for principals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Peterson, . (2002). Teacher hiring: A guide to getting the best. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Peterson, . (2000). Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices (2nd ed.) . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Peterson, . (1988). Reliability of panel judgments for promotion in a school teacher career ladder system. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21 (4), 95-99.
Peterson, . (1989). Costs of school teacher evaluation in a career ladder system. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 22 (2), 30-36.
Peterson, . (1990). Assistance and assessment for beginning teachers. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (eds.) The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. (pp 104-115). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Briefly state your position, state why the problem you are working on is important, and indicate the important questions that need to be answered; this is your "Introduction." Push quickly through this draft--don't worry about spelling, don't search for exactly the right word, don't hassle yourself with grammar, don't worry overmuch about sequence--that's why this is called a "rough draft." Deal with these during your revisions. The point of a rough draft is to get your ideas on paper. Once they are there, you can deal with the superficial (though very important) problems.